Mary Shelley – Cloning

In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein, the topic of cloning and the moral issues relating to it become prevalent. showtime of all, the marionette in the refreshing was in essence a human being clone. The prick was created by master copy Frankenstein in attempt to help worldly concern by searching of a way to perpetuate life-time and eliminate death. Ironically, Victor Frankenstein creates a being that takes life away making him, in a way, the reliable monster of the story. Mary Shelley explores the mindset of alliance by portraying the way society allots a ingathering of scientific knowledge,such as the practice of human cloning.Shelley depicts societys reaction to the creature that Victor Frankenstein created as negative, and displays Victors reflections on the problems that his creature creates for him. Shelleys position on cloning is that the possible benefits ar not reliable enough to subordinate the bad and thus, making the practice of cloning negative. Mary Shelley begins her sassy with a well-kn have quote from John Miltons Paradise Lost, Did I request thee, Maker, from my clay/ To impression me Man,/ did I solicit thee from darkness to promote me? This rhetorical question made by Adam, a launching of God, epitomize the creatures feelings toward his motive, Victor Frankenstein. The creature is comparing himself as to both Adam and Lucifer, or Satan, as he is shunned and left in abandonment by his own creator, though he strives to be good. Because of the isolation and loneliness that the creature had to deal with, it ca employ him to turn evil and eventually, into a murderer. Eventually, it also led to Victor Frankensteins bust in attempt to rid humanity of the creature when ironically, was for humanity in the first place.This reveals mans attempt to play God, to create life from nothingness, can lead to horrible results. Mary Shelleys refreshed is also reference to as the Modern Prometheus. Similarly, Prometheus and Victor Frankenstein both a ttempted to create something to benefit humanity however, their creations ended up harming themselves and this led to their own destruction. Prometheus stole fire for man, trespassing on immortal soil and resulted in having his liver eaten out every night for eternity. In comparison, Victor Frankenstein suffered from prolonged torture and guilt feelings due to his creation murdering all of his loved ones.Both characters go too far and does not guide their own limitations. Similar to Prometheus, who was tied up to a rock, alone in the middle of the sea, Frankenstein feels left out by society and cannot run away from his situation. Victor Frankensteins dream is to create a whole species that ordain bless him, a species of wonderful, perfect beings A new species would bless me as its creator and source numerous happy and excellent natures would owe their being to me. In addition, it seems like Victor Frankenstein wanted to create the creature to praise him more than to improve an d help human nature.Even though, while Frankenstein had a good motive when creating the creature, he failed to ask himself if the creature himself would want to be brought into the world. On the other hand, he refuses his responsibility and flees from the creature after bring it to life. He leaves the creature alone and does not understand the fact that he as the creator is a father and his responsible for his creation. Frankenstein does not teach the creature how to deal with the badness of society and how to treat other human beings.He does not teach the creature from right and wrong and should have accepted the creature as a human, not a ugly monster. Eventually, the creature is, in a sense, corrupted by society, while Frankenstein deserts him due to fear of the creature. Therefore, Victor Frankenstein can be portrayed as a monstrous instead of the creature itself. Even at the end of the novel, he does not learn to accept his own failure of moral imaginations and dies without und erstanding the nature of his own guilt. Mary Shelleys Frankenstein is a slap-up depiction of how science advancements, such as a the practice of human cloning, can go wrong.Even though Frankenstein is a fiction novel, contents contained in Frankenstein can well compare to the situations that we have in society today, especially in the field of science. Although some may say the practice of cloning could be used to find about many genes that can cause possible diseases, improving the quality of foods that we eat, and obviate the human aging process however, it is scientifically proven that 90% of cloning attempts fail to produce viable offspring, cloned beings hunt to have weak immune functions, higher rates of infection, develop diseases, alter normal human lifespan, and more.Relating to Frankenstein, the novel displays how discrimination and tension would arise in the world if cloning were to take place. Human cloning would charge up apart the world, and would result in to winnin g side, just one distraught world, similar to lives of people that were taken away by the creature in Frankenstein. Therefore, if Mary Shelley were to live in the present time, today, she would not admire of the scientific practice of cloning. The beneficial evidences that are believed in the practice of cloning can not overcome how disastrous the world would become if science were to take use of cloning.