THE Nuremberg Trials Essay Example for Free

THE Nuremberg Trials EssaySection 1 introduction Hypotheses Importance of Study MethodologySection 2 Presentation and Analysis of Data (a) The Need for Gaining nicety last solutions muniment (b) The Victims to Whom Justice Must be RenderedSection 3 Topic heavyset Section 4 abolish NotesThe Nuremberg TrialSection 1 Introduction final solution had been a grand mark in the pages of adult male report. Understandably, the ones who were involved within the situation as the victims certainly need to agnise the fact that they atomic number 18 given the judge that they primarily deserve. Justice is one particular thing that could at least ease the pain of the family members of the victims if not the victims themselves of the said historical all the samet. The establishment of the legalities of the matter through the Nuremberg trials very notes the possible ways by which the said victims could be given the safeice that they deserve.Hypotheses The need for justice is an un embellished right of altogether human beings beings. Understandably, through the Nuremberg trials, this particular right of the victimized individuals during the Nazi regime sh every be given attention through legal measures and investigations and punishment for those who urinate been found guilty of the massive human death that happened during the holocaust.Importance of Study Understanding explanation and knowing that whatever injustices happened back consequently be given the chance to be straightened out later on through legal terms gives the union a better vision on the strength of legal institutions to take careful hold of upholding the idealisms of human rights. This gives the entire human society a better view of how the legal system deeds and how justice is applied even upon those who were powerful in government office. Justice served through careful investigation and rightful(prenominal) punishment stand as the proof of the strength of the legal systems to imply ri ghtful justice for the victims of any struggle era which would rather give relief to those who were victimized as well as to their family members whom they whitethorn have left if they unfortunately died during the said majestic events in the past.Methodology To be able to compile the rightful foundation of the discussion that shall be familiariseed herein, the researcher is to use the history of holocaust as a primary basis as to how the Nuremberg trial developed towards the aim of finding the right population who are supposed to answer for the deaths of many a(prenominal) people during ball state of war II. Later on, the discussion on the minutes with which the idea of setting up a Nuremberg Trial shall also be given explanation thusly giving a clear discussion on how the said system of justice and punishment works and how it particularly gave the martyrs and the victims a sense of justice from all the dreadful things that they have experienced during the Second World W ar.Section 2 Presentation and Analysis of Data(a) The Need for Gaining Justice Holocausts HistoryHOLOCAUSTwhat does it mean? According to some dictionaries, it was the genocidal slaughter of European Jews by the Nazis during World WarII. This could considerably give the impression that only Jews poseed and died at the hands of the Nazis. Yet, are justice and truth served in having Holocaust apply only to the Jewish victims of the Nazi era?Writer Richard Lukas acress The word Holocaust suggests to most people the tragedy the Jews experienced infra the Germans during World WarII. From a psychological point of view, it is understandable wherefore Jews today prefer that the term refer exclusively to the Jewish experience ... Yet, by excluding others from inclusion in the Holocaust, the horrors that Poles, other Slavs, and Gypsies endured at the hands of the Nazis are often ignored, if not forgotten.Lukas also states To them the historians, the Holocaust was unique to the Jews, and they accordingly have had little or nothing to say about the nine gazillion Gentiles, including three billion Gentile Poles, who also perished in the greatest tragedy the world has ever known.When Hitlers armies invaded Po destroy in September 1939, they were under companionships to carry out Hitlers policy of obtaining Lebensraum, living space, for the German people. As Richard Lukas states To the Nazis, the Poles were Untermenschen (subhumans) who occupied a land which was part of the Lebensraum (living space) coveted by the superior German race. Thus, Hitler original his troops to kill without ignominy or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish descent or language. Only in this way mess we obtain the living space we need. ( come up of Law, Internet)September 1939 started a relentless horror for the Polish people. Hitler had stated The war is to be a war of annihilation. Hitlers henchman Heinrich Himmler declared All Poles will disappear from the world. ... It is natu ral that the great German people should consider it as a major task to destroy all Poles. Thus, the Holocaust was not aimed at just Polish Jews it was aimed at all Poles. dismay was applied in all occupied countries. ... But in Poland everyone was subject to such brutality, and mass executions based on the normal of collective guilt were far more frequent, because every Pole, regardless of age, sex, or health, was a member of a condemned nationcondemned by the policy-makers in the Nazi party and government, states Catherine Leach, translator of the Polish book Values and military unit in Auschwitz. She states that Himmler viewed the Poles as a lower race to be kept in serfdom.Even afterward Polands surrender September 28, 1939, the Wehrmacht German troops continued to take seriously Hitlers admonition of August 22, 1939, when he authorized killing without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of Polish descent or language. How could the German army and the SS be motivated t o such pitiless murder? By being saturated with the teaching of the advantage of the Aryan race and the inferiority of all others. Thus, as Lukas states in The Forgotten Holocaust The Nazi opening of colonial empire in Poland was based on the denial of humanity to the Poles whom, next to the Jews, Hitler hated the most.In his introduction to the book Commandant of Auschwitz, Lord Russell of Liverpool said During the war probably not less than dozen million men, women, and children from the invaded and occupied territories were done to death by the Germans. At a conservative estimate, eight million of them perished in concentration camps. Of these, not less than five million were Jews. ... The real number, however, will never be known. On the basis of these figures alone, at least seven million victims were not Jews.Another testimony is that of Catherine Leach, who writes Poland was the starting time country to be subjected to Hitlers negative demographic policy, whose purpose wa s to prepare the vast territories in The eastern for German resettlement, and Poland suffered the greatest losses in life of all the occupied countries220 per 1000 inhabitants. Polish sources state that no less than 6,028,000 Polish citizens ... lost their lives. Of these, 3,200,000 were Jews. That means that nearly 50% of the Polish dead were non-Jews. (Conquest, 1990, 92)Indisputably, in that respect has been a Forgotten Holocaust of millions of non-Jewish victims, mainly of Slavic origin. These include the millions of Russians slaughtered by the Nazis. Those Russians had no choice (Conquest, 1990, 92). By antecedent of Nazi racial doctrine, they were inexorably condemned to death. Yet, these statistics fail to take into account the thousands of non-Jewish Germans who also suffered as victims of the Holocaust for daring to oppose Hitler and his racist supremacy philosophy. Among these were thousands of Jehovahs Witnesses who refused to collaborate in Hitlers militaristic preten sions (Conquest, 1990, 92). Yes, sprinkled across Germany and the Nazi-occupied countries were thousands of people who made a deliberate choice that led to the concentration camps and to death for many as martyrs.(b) The Victims to Whom Justice Must be RenderedWHY make a distinction between victims and martyrs? Because all those who suffered as a result of the Holocaust were victims, but only a minority were truly martyrs in the strict sense of the word. What is the difference (Bauer, 1972, 1300). A victim is someone who is put to death or subjected to whirl or suffering by another. Victims usually have no choice. A martyr is one who chooses to suffer death rather than renounce religious principles or one who sacrifices something very important to him in order to further a belief, cause, or principle. (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language) Thus, the victim is usually involuntary, era the martyr is voluntary.In a conference on the non-Jewish victims of the Nazis , Dr.Gordon Zahn, University of Massachusetts, defined the Nazis victims under three headings (1) those who suffered for what they wereJews, Slavs, Gypsies (2) those who suffered for what they didhomosexuals, political activists, and resisters (3) and those who suffered for what they refused to doconscientious objectors. Millions of Jews suffered and died simply because they were Jews in the ethnic sense. It mattered not to Hitlers henchmen whether they were Orthodox or atheistic Jews (Shnayerson, 1996, 132). They were condemned to the final solution, or extermination, as Hitlers method of ridding Europe of all Jews was called. Likewise, the Slavs, who for Hitlers crusade were mainly the Poles, Russians, and Ukrainians, were condemned just for being Slavic, an inferior race in comparison to the supreme Aryan stock.The existence of the major victims of the history of holocaust primarily shouts out towards the legal systems at present to be able to gain the justice that they believe t hey deserve as primary receivers of the hideous situations of those times. This is the reason why the introduction of the Nuremberg trials actually answers this particular need, not only to give justice to the people who were directly affected by the said history but also to clarify the names who are really involved with the said situation in the past. In connection with the Nuremberg (Germany) trial of Nazi war criminals after World War II, the Nuremberg Law that was followed was this chauvinistic obedience in crime does not establish innocence. The development of the Nuremberg trials started during the end of the Second World War when the victims of the Nazi regime began to cry out for the justice that they ought to receive. Having the people responsible for what has happened back then was believed to be a great relief to the depression that such victims felt after the war years. Their recovery of the dreadful experiences that they have dealt with during the war years is the utmo st concern of such proceedings.Moreover, the said trial tries to identify the culprits rat the holocaust murder to give a statement that such acts of inhumane treatment deserves to be penalise and shall never be overlooked by the legal systems established by the alliance of the different nations from then until the present days. It was primarily the symbol of the beginning of the recognition of human rights that is supposed to mark the minds of those who are comfort planning to do the same thing as Hitler himself did along with his comrades.Section 3 Topic stocky History would be history, but the indications of truth that it leaves the human civilization are reactive up until the present years of human living. The Nuremberg Trial remains to be among the huge indications that history actually impacts the legal systems until the watercourse generations of human civilization.Likely, this system of historical impact in the legal systems does more than just address the necessarily of war victims. It also developed a more systematic process of which the human rights would be safeguarded even during war situations in case they would occur. This particular part of history is indeed a primary reason why it is important to turn ones back to the past and learn something from what has happened before to have things run smoothly at present for everyone living in the human society.Section 4 End Notes John Crossland Churchill execute Hitler without trial in The Sunday Times, January 1, 2006 Tehran Conference Tripartite Dinner encounter November 29, 1943 Soviet Embassy, 830 PM Judgement The Law Relating to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity contained in the Avalon flip archive at Yale Law School. but by 1939 these rules laid down in the Hague Convention of 1907 were recognised by all civilized nations, and were regarded as being declaratory of the laws and customs of war Trial of Otto Skorzeny and Others, everyday Military Government Court of the U.S. Zone of Germany, 18 August to 9 September 1947.Bibliography Conquest, Robert. The Great Terror A Reassessment London Oxford University Press, 1990 page 92. Bauer, Eddy. The Marshall Cavendish Illustrated Encyclopedia of World War II bulk 22 New York Marshall Cavendish Corporation 1972 page 3071. Robert Shnayerson. Judgment at Nuremberg Fifty years past the trial of Nazi war criminals ended the world had witnessed the rule of law invoked to punish unspeakable atrocities. From Smithsonian magazine, October 1996, pp. 124141. 1996. The Rule of Law. http//law.wustl.edu/alumni/magazine/spring2002/01_rule_of_law.pdf. (June 29, 2008). Trial of Otto Skorzeny and Others, General Military Government Court of the U.S. Zone of Germany, 18 August to 9 September 1947.(The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language)